Pepperstone
Forex and CFD broker
◆ Individual team experience
Evidence · Experience
Experience, with the basis stated
The marketers behind this firm have worked with the brands below through in-house, agency and direct-client engagements. The basis is stated without implying endorsement.
- Approved brands
- 10
- Basis
- Team history + client
- Endorsement
- None implied
- Disclosure
- Permission-led
Titan FX
Forex and CFD broker
◆ Individual team experience
Barclays
Banking
◆ Individual team experience
iShares
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
iShares was part of Barclays Bank at the time of the team-history work and is now BlackRock-owned. Listed by Ollie on 10 August 2026; team-history basis like the Barclays brand.
◆ Individual team experience
Allianz
Insurance
◆ Individual team experience
Moula
Business lending fintech
◆ Individual team experience
Sportsbet
Regulated wagering
◆ Individual team experience
IASbet
Sports and racing wagering
Closed wagering brand, formerly a subsidiary of Sportsbet. Listed by Ollie on 3 August 2026; team-history basis like the parent brand.
◆ Individual team experience
SFX Funded
Proprietary trading firm
Active client. Public naming and logo use approved. Performance claims still require separate evidence and approval.
◆ Direct client
TradeTheDay
Broker comparison and trading media
Related party: TradeTheDay is also an Underdog Digital property. Disclose the connection if it is ever used as proof of independent results.
◆ Direct client
How to read this page
Not a client roster
Experience gained in-house, through agency engagements and through approved direct-client work. Inclusion does not indicate a current retainer with Fintech Traffic, and no brand listed endorses this firm.
Team-history entries represent experience held by an individual behind Fintech Traffic, gained in-house or through an agency engagement. Direct-client entries are labelled explicitly.
Where a current client is named, public inclusion has permission. Performance figures and case studies still require separate evidence and approval.
Publication standard
Six checks before a brand is named
Most agency experience pages are assembled from the careers of everyone who has ever worked there, with the distinction between past and present left deliberately vague. This one is managed as a verification process.
01
Basis established
Whether the work was undertaken in-house, through an agency engagement or directly for the brand. The basis is recorded per brand rather than described in general terms, because the difference matters to a reader assessing fit.
02
Evidence on file
A record that the experience exists. A brand is not published on the basis of a recollection or a claim in a brief.
03
Publication approved
A separate decision from verification. Where a brand has not approved public display of its name and mark, it does not appear on this page, regardless of the strength of the work behind it.
04
Wording constrained
Every entry uses the same approved sentence. No brand is described as a client, a partner, an endorsement or a current relationship unless that is explicitly and separately true.
05
Claims excluded
Performance figures, rankings, awards and testimonials require their own evidence and their own approval. None is published on the strength of a name being listed here.
06
Withdrawn on request
If a brand asks to be removed, it is removed. The list is a statement about history, not a permanent claim on anyone else’s reputation.
Why it is written this way
The problem with the usual version
A logo wall with no qualifier is doing something specific: it invites a reader to assume a current client relationship, a retainer and an endorsement, without ever stating one. That works until a prospect checks, and in finance a prospect often does, because the same instinct that makes them cautious about a product makes them cautious about a supplier.
Stating the basis produces a shorter list and a harder conversation at the start. It also means the claims on this site can survive a compliance team reading them, which is the standard the work itself is held to.
The same standard applies elsewhere on the site. The case-study page is empty by choice, the Prop Firm Visibility Index has not been published in a form that would require invented data, and the reporting visuals are labelled as illustrative wherever a figure is shown to demonstrate a format.
Keep reading
The rest of the evidence trail
- Case studies Why the first published study is still in preparation.
- Editorial policy Sourcing, review, correction and update practice.
- Prop Firm Visibility Index The published methodology for the demand research.
- About Fintech Traffic Who runs the firm and how it is structured.
- Market Capture method The six stages every engagement runs through.
- Fintech SEO audit The first output, and what it contains.
Next step
Judge the fit on the market problem.
The Fintech SEO Audit gives you a concrete first output before a longer engagement is discussed.